MENU
View Categories

Transparency Reporting Policy

4 min read

AI Doc Summarizer Doc Summary

Module: Governance & Enforcement (Utsav World™ / Utsav Messenger™)
Document Type: Hybrid — Plain English + Legal Reinforcement
Trademark: Utsav World™ and Utsav Messenger™ are trademarks of MyMahotsav Futuretech Ltd
Effective Date: 24th February 2026
Version: 1.0


Part A: Plain English Summary #

Our Commitment to Transparency #

Trust requires transparency. That’s why Utsav World™ publishes regular reports on how we enforce our rules, respond to government requests, and protect our community.

The Simple Truth #

  • We publish reports twice a year: January and July.

  • We share data on content removals: What we removed and why.

  • We report government requests: Who asked for data and how we responded.

  • We’re open about appeals: How many people appealed and what happened.

  • We protect privacy: Reports use aggregate data—no individual user identified.


1. Purpose of Transparency Reporting #

1.1 Utsav World™ is committed to transparency as a core value. Our Transparency Reports:

  • Inform users about how we enforce policies

  • Demonstrate accountability to regulators

  • Contribute to public understanding of online platforms

  • Build trust with our community

1.2 Reports are published in accordance with:

  • Our voluntary commitment to transparency

  • Legal requirements (EU DSA, India IT Rules)

  • Industry best practices

2. Report Content #

2.1 Content Moderation Data #

Data Point Description
Total content removed Number of pieces of content removed
By violation type Breakdown by policy category
By detection method Automated vs. human review
By geography Country-level data where available
Appeals received Number of appeals submitted
Appeals upheld Number of decisions reversed

2.2 Account Actions #

Data Point Description
Accounts warned Number of warnings issued
Accounts suspended Temporary suspensions
Accounts terminated Permanent removals
Repeat infringers Accounts with multiple violations

2.3 Government Requests #

Request Type Data Provided
User Data Requests Number received, percentage complied
Content Takedown Requests Number received, percentage complied
Emergency Requests Number received, nature of emergencies
Countries Breakdown by requesting country

2.4 Intellectual Property #

Data Point Description
DMCA/Copyright Notices Number received, content removed
Counter-Notices Number received, content restored
Trademark Notices Number received, actions taken

2.5 Appeals Data #

Data Point Description
Total appeals Number submitted
By decision type Content removal, account actions
Resolution time Average and median
Outcomes Upheld, denied, partial

2.6 Child Safety #

Data Point Description
CSAM reports Number detected
Reports to authorities NCMEC, local law enforcement
Removal time Average time to remove

3. Report Format #

3.1 Transparency Reports include:

  • Executive summary

  • Detailed data tables

  • Explanatory narrative

  • Year-over-year comparisons

  • Methodology notes

3.2 Reports are published in:

  • PDF format for download

  • HTML format for web viewing

  • Machine-readable format (JSON/CSV) for researchers

4. Reporting Schedule #

Report Covers Period Published By
Mid-Year Report January – June July 31
Annual Report January – December January 31

4.1 Special reports may be published:

  • After significant events

  • When required by regulators

  • As part of specific investigations

5. Data Limitations #

5.1 Transparency Reports have limitations:

  • Data is aggregated, not user-level

  • Some data may be suppressed for legal reasons

  • Definitions may change over time

  • Not all violations are detected

5.2 We explain methodologies and changes in each report.

6. Confidentiality and Privacy #

6.1 Transparency Reports do not include:

  • Personally identifiable information

  • Information about specific users

  • Details that could compromise ongoing investigations

  • Information protected by law

6.2 Government request data is aggregated to prevent identification of specific targets.

7. Regulatory Compliance #

7.1 India – IT Rules, 2021 #

7.1.1 Significant social media intermediaries must publish monthly compliance reports including:

  • Number of complaints received

  • Number of complaints acted upon

  • Average response time

  • Content removed proactively

7.1.2 Utsav World™ publishes these reports at: https://mymahotsav.com/compliance-india

7.2 EU – Digital Services Act #

7.2.1 Very Large Online Platforms (if applicable) must publish:

  • Content moderation decisions

  • Risk assessments

  • Systemic risks identified

  • Audit results

7.2.2 Reports submitted to European Commission and published.

7.3 UK – Online Safety Act #

7.3.1 Transparency reporting required to Ofcom including:

  • Illegal content detection

  • Child safety measures

  • Enforcement actions

8. Researcher Access #

8.1 Utsav World™ may provide enhanced data access to:

  • Vetted academic researchers

  • Public interest organizations

  • Regulatory bodies

8.2 Researcher access requires:

  • Formal application

  • Research proposal

  • Data protection agreements

  • Ethics approval

8.3 Apply at: research@utsavworld.com

9. Historical Reports #

9.1 All Transparency Reports are archived and available at:
https://mymahotsav.com/transparency/archive

9.2 Archive includes:

  • Current and past reports

  • Methodology changes over time

  • Data corrections (if any)

10. Feedback and Questions #

10.1 Questions about Transparency Reports may be directed to:

  • transparency@utsavworld.com

  • Grievance Officer (India users)

10.2 We welcome feedback on:

  • Data we should include

  • Format improvements

  • Accessibility


Part C: Jurisdiction-Specific Addendums #

India Addendum #

IT Rules, 2021 – Rule 4(2) :

  • Monthly compliance reports

  • Number of complaints received and acted upon

  • Content removed proactively

  • Published on website

EU Addendum #

Digital Services Act – Article 42:

  • Transparency reporting obligations for all intermediary services

  • Detailed content for very large online platforms

  • Submission to European Commission

UK Addendum #

Online Safety Act – Section 86:

  • Transparency reports to Ofcom

  • Specified by Ofcom in notices

  • May include illegal content, child safety

US Addendum #

No federal transparency reporting requirement, but:

  • Voluntary industry standards (Santa Clara Principles)

  • State laws may impose requirements

#

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *