- Part A: Plain English Summary
- Part B: Legal Terms and Conditions
- Part C: Jurisdiction-Specific Addendums
Module: Governance & Enforcement (Utsav World™ / Utsav Messenger™)
Document Type: Hybrid — Plain English + Legal Reinforcement
Trademark: Utsav World™ and Utsav Messenger™ are trademarks of MyMahotsav Futuretech Ltd
Effective Date: 24th February 2026
Version: 1.0
Part A: Plain English Summary #
Our Commitment to Transparency #
Trust requires transparency. That’s why Utsav World™ publishes regular reports on how we enforce our rules, respond to government requests, and protect our community.
The Simple Truth #
-
We publish reports twice a year: January and July.
-
We share data on content removals: What we removed and why.
-
We report government requests: Who asked for data and how we responded.
-
We’re open about appeals: How many people appealed and what happened.
-
We protect privacy: Reports use aggregate data—no individual user identified.
Part B: Legal Terms and Conditions #
1. Purpose of Transparency Reporting #
1.1 Utsav World™ is committed to transparency as a core value. Our Transparency Reports:
-
Inform users about how we enforce policies
-
Demonstrate accountability to regulators
-
Contribute to public understanding of online platforms
-
Build trust with our community
1.2 Reports are published in accordance with:
-
Our voluntary commitment to transparency
-
Legal requirements (EU DSA, India IT Rules)
-
Industry best practices
2. Report Content #
2.1 Content Moderation Data #
| Data Point | Description |
|---|---|
| Total content removed | Number of pieces of content removed |
| By violation type | Breakdown by policy category |
| By detection method | Automated vs. human review |
| By geography | Country-level data where available |
| Appeals received | Number of appeals submitted |
| Appeals upheld | Number of decisions reversed |
2.2 Account Actions #
| Data Point | Description |
|---|---|
| Accounts warned | Number of warnings issued |
| Accounts suspended | Temporary suspensions |
| Accounts terminated | Permanent removals |
| Repeat infringers | Accounts with multiple violations |
2.3 Government Requests #
| Request Type | Data Provided |
|---|---|
| User Data Requests | Number received, percentage complied |
| Content Takedown Requests | Number received, percentage complied |
| Emergency Requests | Number received, nature of emergencies |
| Countries | Breakdown by requesting country |
2.4 Intellectual Property #
| Data Point | Description |
|---|---|
| DMCA/Copyright Notices | Number received, content removed |
| Counter-Notices | Number received, content restored |
| Trademark Notices | Number received, actions taken |
2.5 Appeals Data #
| Data Point | Description |
|---|---|
| Total appeals | Number submitted |
| By decision type | Content removal, account actions |
| Resolution time | Average and median |
| Outcomes | Upheld, denied, partial |
2.6 Child Safety #
| Data Point | Description |
|---|---|
| CSAM reports | Number detected |
| Reports to authorities | NCMEC, local law enforcement |
| Removal time | Average time to remove |
3. Report Format #
3.1 Transparency Reports include:
-
Executive summary
-
Detailed data tables
-
Explanatory narrative
-
Year-over-year comparisons
-
Methodology notes
3.2 Reports are published in:
-
PDF format for download
-
HTML format for web viewing
-
Machine-readable format (JSON/CSV) for researchers
4. Reporting Schedule #
| Report | Covers Period | Published By |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Year Report | January – June | July 31 |
| Annual Report | January – December | January 31 |
4.1 Special reports may be published:
-
After significant events
-
When required by regulators
-
As part of specific investigations
5. Data Limitations #
5.1 Transparency Reports have limitations:
-
Data is aggregated, not user-level
-
Some data may be suppressed for legal reasons
-
Definitions may change over time
-
Not all violations are detected
5.2 We explain methodologies and changes in each report.
6. Confidentiality and Privacy #
6.1 Transparency Reports do not include:
-
Personally identifiable information
-
Information about specific users
-
Details that could compromise ongoing investigations
-
Information protected by law
6.2 Government request data is aggregated to prevent identification of specific targets.
7. Regulatory Compliance #
7.1 India – IT Rules, 2021 #
7.1.1 Significant social media intermediaries must publish monthly compliance reports including:
-
Number of complaints received
-
Number of complaints acted upon
-
Average response time
-
Content removed proactively
7.1.2 Utsav World™ publishes these reports at: https://mymahotsav.com/compliance-india
7.2 EU – Digital Services Act #
7.2.1 Very Large Online Platforms (if applicable) must publish:
-
Content moderation decisions
-
Risk assessments
-
Systemic risks identified
-
Audit results
7.2.2 Reports submitted to European Commission and published.
7.3 UK – Online Safety Act #
7.3.1 Transparency reporting required to Ofcom including:
-
Illegal content detection
-
Child safety measures
-
Enforcement actions
8. Researcher Access #
8.1 Utsav World™ may provide enhanced data access to:
-
Vetted academic researchers
-
Public interest organizations
-
Regulatory bodies
8.2 Researcher access requires:
-
Formal application
-
Research proposal
-
Data protection agreements
-
Ethics approval
8.3 Apply at: research@utsavworld.com
9. Historical Reports #
9.1 All Transparency Reports are archived and available at:
https://mymahotsav.com/transparency/archive
9.2 Archive includes:
-
Current and past reports
-
Methodology changes over time
-
Data corrections (if any)
10. Feedback and Questions #
10.1 Questions about Transparency Reports may be directed to:
-
transparency@utsavworld.com
-
Grievance Officer (India users)
10.2 We welcome feedback on:
-
Data we should include
-
Format improvements
-
Accessibility
Part C: Jurisdiction-Specific Addendums #
India Addendum #
IT Rules, 2021 – Rule 4(2) :
-
Monthly compliance reports
-
Number of complaints received and acted upon
-
Content removed proactively
-
Published on website
EU Addendum #
Digital Services Act – Article 42:
-
Transparency reporting obligations for all intermediary services
-
Detailed content for very large online platforms
-
Submission to European Commission
UK Addendum #
Online Safety Act – Section 86:
-
Transparency reports to Ofcom
-
Specified by Ofcom in notices
-
May include illegal content, child safety
US Addendum #
No federal transparency reporting requirement, but:
-
Voluntary industry standards (Santa Clara Principles)
-
State laws may impose requirements






Responses